The Supreme Court takes up major challenges to the power of federal regulators

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court on Wednesday is taking up challenges by commercial fishermen to a fee requirement that could achieve a long-sought goal of business and conservative interests: limiting a wide swath of government regulations.

Billions of dollars are potentially at stake in front of a court that, like the rest of the federal judiciary, was remade during Donald Trump’s presidency by conservative interests that were motivated as much by weakening the regulatory state as social issues including abortion.

Lawyers for the fishermen are asking the justices to overturn a 40-year-old decision that is among the most frequently cited high court cases in support of regulatory power, including on the environment, public health, workplace safety and consumer protections.

Lower courts used the decision known colloquially as Chevron to uphold a 2020 National Marine Fisheries Service rule that herring fishermen pay for government-mandated observers who track their fish intake.

<bsp-list-loadmore data-module="" class=«PageListStandardB» data-gtm-region=«Other news» data-gtm-topic=«No Value» data-show-loadmore=«true» data-gtm-modulestyle=«List B»> <bsp-custom-headline custom-headline=«div»> Other news </bsp-custom-headline> <bsp-custom-headline custom-headline=«div»> Top Federal Reserve official says inflation fight seems nearly won, with rate cuts coming </bsp-custom-headline> <bsp-custom-headline custom-headline=«div»> A little fish at the Supreme Court could take a big bite out of regulatory power </bsp-custom-headline> <bsp-custom-headline custom-headline=«div»> EPA sets out rules for proposed ‘methane fee’ for waste generated by oil and natural gas companies </bsp-custom-headline> </bsp-list-loadmore>

The 1984