Supreme Court Upholds Law That Keeps Guns Away From Domestic Abusers

The federal government can continue to limit domestic abusers’ gun rights, according to a landmark ruling issued by the U.S. Supreme Court Friday that helps clarify the conservative-majority court’s thinking on firearm restrictions.

In an 8-1 decision, the Supreme Court affirmed that the federal government can temporarily restrict a person’s right to possess firearms without violating the Second Amendment. Only Justice Clarence Thomas dissented.

The case of United States v. Rahimi had emerged as a high-profile test of how far the Supreme Court was willing to go in expanding gun rights after its sweeping reinterpretation of the Second Amendment two years ago directed courts to stop considering public safety when assessing the constitutionality of firearm restrictions.

A court in Tarrant County, Texas, placed Zackey Rahimi under a protective order on Feb. 5, 2020, after he assaulted his former girlfriend. Prosecutors accused him of shooting guns in public in at least six separate instanceswhile subject to the protective order — including once at a woman he allegedly lured into a parking lot, two instances of alleged road rage and one instance in which he allegedly fired a rifle into someone’s home.

When police investigating those shootings searched Rahimi’s room on Jan. 14, 2021, they discovered a semiautomatic rifle under the bed and a pistol with an extended magazine on the nightstand, along with a copy of the protective order. A 1994 federal law makes it a felony to possess firearms while subject to a protective order in a domestic violence case.

Rahimi, facing an open-and-shut case, pleaded guilty.

But in 2022, Justice Clarence Thomas laid out a new constitutional standard for assessing gun restrictions when the