PolitMaster.com is a comprehensive online platform providing insightful coverage of the political arena: International Relations, Domestic Policies, Economic Developments, Electoral Processes, and Legislative Updates. With expert analysis, live updates, and in-depth features, we bring you closer to the heart of politics. Exclusive interviews, up-to-date photos, and video content, alongside breaking news, keep you informed around the clock. Stay engaged with the world of politics 24/7.

Contacts

  • Owner: SNOWLAND s.r.o.
  • Registration certificate 06691200
  • 16200, Na okraji 381/41, Veleslavín, 162 00 Praha 6
  • Czech Republic

Rudy Giuliani agrees to last-minute deal to end bankruptcy case, paying out $400k

Cash-strapped Rudy Giuliani has reached an agreement with his bankruptcy creditors on the conditions of his case dismissal, which requires the former New York City mayor to pay $400,000 in administrative expenses.

The deal was announced on Wednesday after Judge Sean Lane threw out the bankruptcy case earlier this month. But the disgraced ex-mayor is still on the hook to pay two defamed election workers, whom he owes$148m. He is also required to pay administrative fees for the case, which the former Trump lawyer had refused to pay despite it being a legal requirement for dismissal.

The agreement, which still has to be signed off by the judge, proposes that Giuliani transfers $100,000 to his lawyers “to be held in escrow for the purpose of paying allowed professional fees and expenses” one day after the order is entered.

The remaining fees shall be paid from the proceeds of the sale of either Giuliani’s New York City apartment or Florida condo, “whichever sale occurs first.”

Giuliani’s New York condo, which has been up for sale on and off throughout the year, is valued at around $5.6m, while his Florida condo is valued at about $3.5m. The former mayor’s lawyer previously argued against their client selling both places, claiming that it would result in Giuliani “join[ing] the ranks of the homeless.”

Last week, Lane ordered the parties in the case to submit filings to “provide their views on the most appropriate path forward.” The agreement was reached hours before the deadline.

The judge wrote on July 25 that despite ordering a dismissal, the court and the parties might need to “reconsider whether dismissal is the most appropriate course of action in this case” because “there may come a point when dismissal is no longer

Read more on independent.co.uk