PolitMaster.com is a comprehensive online platform providing insightful coverage of the political arena: International Relations, Domestic Policies, Economic Developments, Electoral Processes, and Legislative Updates. With expert analysis, live updates, and in-depth features, we bring you closer to the heart of politics. Exclusive interviews, up-to-date photos, and video content, alongside breaking news, keep you informed around the clock. Stay engaged with the world of politics 24/7.

Contacts

  • Owner: SNOWLAND s.r.o.
  • Registration certificate 06691200
  • 16200, Na okraji 381/41, Veleslavín, 162 00 Praha 6
  • Czech Republic

Pro-Trump clerk convicted of election tampering goes on show a day later to promote same false claims

A former pro-Trump county clerk pushed conspiracies about voting machine tampering — just one day after being criminally convicted of the same thing.

Tina Peters, who worked in Mesa County was convicted of seven out of 10 criminal charges on Monday, including three counts of attempting to influence a public servant, one count of conspiracy to commit criminal impersonation, first-degree official misconduct, violation of duty and failing to comply with the secretary of state.

The jury acquitted her of one felony count of identity theft and two felony counts of criminal impersonation. Prosecutors told jurors that the woman had used a security badge to access the election system without the owner’s consent.

Even after her conviction, Peters refused to back down from her claims over “vote flipping software.”

Speaking on Steve Bannon’s War Room she vowed to appeal her guilty verdict, saying: “We’re going to continue to fight this in the law.

“And in the meantime, until they either kill me or put me in prison, I’m going to keep speaking out about the injustice, about what’s going on in these big multinational global corporations that have this vote flipping software.”

During her Tuesday rant, Peters claimed that the jury during her trial was shielded from critical evidence that could have exonerated her.

«The jury was prevented from hearing real evidence and hearing real witnesses,” she said, adding that the introduction of several key witnesses, such as forensic experts and whistleblowers, was obstructed by the court.

During her March trial, prosecutors said the clerk became “fixated” on voting problems after becoming involved with individuals who had questioned the results of the 2020 election.

Defense attorneys for Peters

Read more on independent.co.uk