PolitMaster.com is a comprehensive online platform providing insightful coverage of the political arena: International Relations, Domestic Policies, Economic Developments, Electoral Processes, and Legislative Updates. With expert analysis, live updates, and in-depth features, we bring you closer to the heart of politics. Exclusive interviews, up-to-date photos, and video content, alongside breaking news, keep you informed around the clock. Stay engaged with the world of politics 24/7.

Contacts

  • Owner: SNOWLAND s.r.o.
  • Registration certificate 06691200
  • 16200, Na okraji 381/41, Veleslavín, 162 00 Praha 6
  • Czech Republic

Oregon Supreme Court Punts Trump Ballot Question To U.S. Supreme Court

The Oregon Supreme Court on Friday declined to hear a case that could have kept Donald Trump off the state’s ballots in 2024, citing a pending U.S. Supreme Court hearing on the matter.

Five Oregon voters are seeking to disqualify the former president based on Section 3 of the 14th Amendment, which bars from state or federal office anyone who “engaged in insurrection or rebellion” against the nation after having sworn an oath to uphold the U.S. Constitution.

The group initially asked Oregon Secretary of State LaVonne Griffin-Valade to strike Trump from Oregon’s primary and general-election ballots. After she declined, arguing that state law didn’t grant her that authority, the voters appealed to the Oregon Supreme Court.

In a 4-3 decision last month, the Colorado Supreme Court ruled that Trump’s involvement in the Jan. 6, 2021, insurrection at the U.S. Capitol met the 14th Amendment threshold, barring him from the ballot there.

One week later, Maine Secretary of State Shenna Bellows reached a similar conclusion.

The U.S. Supreme Court this month agreed to review the Colorado decision, with oral arguments scheduled to begin Feb. 8.

Free Speech for People, the advocacy group representing the Oregon voters, said it was disappointed in the court’s “decision not to decide,” but it emphasized that the decision isn’t necessarily a win for Trump.

“Importantly, the Oregon Supreme Court did not rule against the plaintiffs on any of the merits,” the group noted in a statement.

“It did not say that January 6 was not an ‘insurrection,’” the statement went on. “It did not say that Trump did not ‘engage’ in it; it did not say that Section 3 doesn’t apply to him; it did not say that Congress must pass a law to enforce Section 3; and it

Read more on huffpost.com
DMCA