PolitMaster.com is a comprehensive online platform providing insightful coverage of the political arena: International Relations, Domestic Policies, Economic Developments, Electoral Processes, and Legislative Updates. With expert analysis, live updates, and in-depth features, we bring you closer to the heart of politics. Exclusive interviews, up-to-date photos, and video content, alongside breaking news, keep you informed around the clock. Stay engaged with the world of politics 24/7.

Contacts

  • Owner: SNOWLAND s.r.o.
  • Registration certificate 06691200
  • 16200, Na okraji 381/41, Veleslavín, 162 00 Praha 6
  • Czech Republic

Ketanji Brown Jackson Is 'Prepared' If 2024 Election Goes To Supreme Court

Supreme Court Justice Kentanji Brown Jackson said in a recorded interview with CBS News that she feels “as prepared as anyone can be” when asked about the possibility that the 2024 presidential election results will be contested and require the high court’s intervention.

It’s a scenario that appears likely, as former President Donald Trump has been hinting for months that he will claim the election was “rigged” if he does not win.

He made the same claims in the wake of his 2020 election loss, sparking lawsuits contesting the election’s results that ultimately found no evidence of widespread fraud. A few made their way to the Supreme Court, which rejected them, although some justices were divided.

Jackson gave a rare interview to CBS Evening News’ Norah O’Donnell, which is set to air in full Tuesday evening, according to a statement from the network previewing their sit-down.

With a laugh, Jackson flipped the script on O’Donnell, saying, “Let me ask you, are you prepared for all of the news cycles that you’re getting as a result of this election?”

“Um, no,” the host replied.

“No, exactly,” Jackson said. “I mean, I think there are legal issues that arise out of the political process. And so, the Supreme Court has to be prepared to respond — if — if that should be necessary.”

Jackson also offered a brief comment on the Supreme Court’s controversial presidential immunity ruling, issued in July, which said that U.S. presidents enjoy immunity from prosecution for all acts they take as part of their official duties, although the court did not define what those were. Jackson penned a dissent that said the decision “breaks new and dangerous ground.”

O’Donnell read a section to the justice.

“In your dissent, you wrote that, ‘The

Read more on huffpost.com