PolitMaster.com is a comprehensive online platform providing insightful coverage of the political arena: International Relations, Domestic Policies, Economic Developments, Electoral Processes, and Legislative Updates. With expert analysis, live updates, and in-depth features, we bring you closer to the heart of politics. Exclusive interviews, up-to-date photos, and video content, alongside breaking news, keep you informed around the clock. Stay engaged with the world of politics 24/7.

Contacts

  • Owner: SNOWLAND s.r.o.
  • Registration certificate 06691200
  • 16200, Na okraji 381/41, Veleslavín, 162 00 Praha 6
  • Czech Republic

Katherine Heigl Revisits 'Grey's Anatomy' Controversy: 'I Wasn't Trying To Be A Dick'

Katherine Heigl is setting the record straight about her 2008 squabble with “Grey’s Anatomy.”

The actor upset the show’s writers and producers that year after opting out of Emmy consideration for her performance as Dr. Izzie Stevens — but on Friday’s episode of Shannen Doherty’s “Let’s Be Clear” podcast, Heigl disputed the suggestion that she’d turned down a nomination.

“I didn’t turn it down,” she said. “You have to submit yourself. You have to submit your work, and then they deliberate and then they decide if they want to give you a nomination. I just didn’t submit my work that year.”

She later added: “I was trying to have some integrity. I wasn’t trying to be a dick.”

Heigl, who was one of the leading stars of “Grey’s Anatomy,” had said at the time that she wasn’t “given the material this season to warrant an Emmy nomination.” Her statement was especially notable since she had won an Emmy for her performance on the series one year earlier.

“The show bent over backwards to accommodate her film schedule, and then she criticizes the show for lack of material?” a “Grey’s Anatomy” insider told Entertainment Weekly after her statement was released. “It’s an ungrateful slap in the face to the very writers responsible for her Emmy win in the first place.”

On “Let’s Be Clear,” Heigl seemed regretful about her 2008 comments. She suggested that she “should have said nothing” instead, since her remarks “created such a maelstrom.”

But she also said that her words were motivated by frustration.

“I was kind of trying to make a bit of a snarky point about my material that year, but I was also just not feeling my material,” she told Doherty. “I just wasn’t proud of my work.”

She added: “I would never be so bold or so arrogant to turn

Read more on huffpost.com