PolitMaster.com is a comprehensive online platform providing insightful coverage of the political arena: International Relations, Domestic Policies, Economic Developments, Electoral Processes, and Legislative Updates. With expert analysis, live updates, and in-depth features, we bring you closer to the heart of politics. Exclusive interviews, up-to-date photos, and video content, alongside breaking news, keep you informed around the clock. Stay engaged with the world of politics 24/7.

Contacts

  • Owner: SNOWLAND s.r.o.
  • Registration certificate 06691200
  • 16200, Na okraji 381/41, Veleslavín, 162 00 Praha 6
  • Czech Republic

Join Us for the Debate

Good evening, and welcome to what might be the most important night of the presidential campaign.

In a few hours, President Biden and former President Donald Trump will take the stage in Atlanta for their first presidential debate of 2024. It’s a rare moment when the unexpected could happen — when a stable race could be jolted — and I, for one, won’t be able to take my eyes off it. Join us to watch it live at nytimes.com.

Starting at 7:30 p.m. Eastern time, I’ll be hosting a live chat with colleagues including Maggie Haberman, Jonathan Swan, Lisa Lerer, Reid Epstein, Zolan Kanno-Youngs, Shane Goldmacher, Maya King, Adam Nagourney, Michael Grynbaum, Peter Baker and Alan Rappeport. We’ll help you navigate every twist and turn.

After the debate, I’ll be back with a special edition of On Politics, sharing my thoughts about what happened and guiding you through our coverage.

See you soon!

Tonight, we’ll have a team of 29 people (29!) checking facts and holding both candidates to account if and when they bend the facts. Susanna Timmons, from our Trust team, explained how it will work.

Linda Qiu, our fact-checking point person, will be leading a team that will sift through the rhetoric to reveal what’s true, what’s false and what’s in need of context.

“There’s a difference between ‘exaggerated’ and ‘misleading’ and ‘needs context,’ and we want to make that clear to readers,” Qiu said. As she sees it, the most “pernicious” kind of statement is a misleading one. It seems to be true, she said, “but it is used in a very distorted, deceptive way.”

We draw on our own reporting and our competitors’ to fact-check a claim. But mostly, we take readers to the sources of our reporting — the data, studies and other research that we have relied on.

W

Read more on nytimes.com