PolitMaster.com is a comprehensive online platform providing insightful coverage of the political arena: International Relations, Domestic Policies, Economic Developments, Electoral Processes, and Legislative Updates. With expert analysis, live updates, and in-depth features, we bring you closer to the heart of politics. Exclusive interviews, up-to-date photos, and video content, alongside breaking news, keep you informed around the clock. Stay engaged with the world of politics 24/7.

Contacts

  • Owner: SNOWLAND s.r.o.
  • Registration certificate 06691200
  • 16200, Na okraji 381/41, Veleslavín, 162 00 Praha 6
  • Czech Republic

Florida OKs Misleading Statement To Print Next To Pro-Choice Ballot Measure

The advocates behind Florida’s pro-choice Amendment 4 cleared a huge hurdle in April when the notoriously conservative state Supreme Court approved the measure for the November ballot. Many were relieved at the time — believing that the biggest obstacle was behind them — but after this week, it’s clear they’re not out of the woods just yet.

A Florida administrative committee decided earlier this week on a financial impact statement that must appear alongside Amendment 4 on ballots. Over the course of three meetings, including a 12-hour debate on Monday, the Florida Financial Impact Estimating Conference crafted a statement riddled with misinformation that will be printed next to the amendment seeking to restore abortion access until around 24 weeks in the state.

The supposedly nonpartisan FIEC crafts fiscal statements to appear next to any citizen-led measure that makes it on the ballot. The panel is usually made up of a Florida House staffer, a Florida Senate staffer, a representative from the governor’s office and the state’s chief economist. But state House Speaker Paul Renner ® replaced the House staffer with an economist from the Heritage Foundation, the ultra-conservative think tank behind Project 2025 .

Abortion rights advocates who fought for the ballot measure believe the FIEC statement includes inaccurate information that was written to intentionally mislead voters. Read the statement in full below:

The statement speculates on the costs created by possible future litigation, even though doing so directly conflicts with standards set by the Florida Supreme Court. The statement also inaccurately says that Florida may have to “subsidize abortions with public funds” and that an increase in abortions “may

Read more on huffpost.com