PolitMaster.com is a comprehensive online platform providing insightful coverage of the political arena: International Relations, Domestic Policies, Economic Developments, Electoral Processes, and Legislative Updates. With expert analysis, live updates, and in-depth features, we bring you closer to the heart of politics. Exclusive interviews, up-to-date photos, and video content, alongside breaking news, keep you informed around the clock. Stay engaged with the world of politics 24/7.

Contacts

  • Owner: SNOWLAND s.r.o.
  • Registration certificate 06691200
  • 16200, Na okraji 381/41, Veleslavín, 162 00 Praha 6
  • Czech Republic

Court upholds 10-year conviction of former NYC cop who claimed DC jury was too biased at Jan 6 trial

A retired New York police officer has had his conviction for rioting on January 6 upheld by a federal appeals court in Washington DC after he claimed that the jury in his trial was biased against him.

Thomas Webster was found guilty on six charges by a jury in the district in May 2022. He was sentenced to 10 years in prison for what prosecutors described as confronting and assaulting a Metropolitan police officer with a flagpole.

But a three-judge panel for the US Court of Appeals, DC Circuit ruled on Tuesday that his conviction on five felony counts and one misdemeanor was sound.

Webster argued that the jury was biased because most residents of DC voted for President Joe Biden in 2020, many are connected to the government and had preconceived notions about him due to the limited media attention he received.

But the court rejected his argument.

“Nothing in the record suggests that the District’s jury pool had any preconceived notions about Webster or his guilt or innocence, or even knew who he was. The record lacks any evidence of pervasive (or much of any) media coverage aimed at Webster and his conduct,” the ruling from the appeals court said.

The federal appeals court insisted that Webster received a fair jury selection process during his trial, noting that two jurors who claimed some bias toward President Biden and the federal government were struck from the panel.

Webster argued that the high-profile nature of January 6 would have given jurors preconceived notions about the events but the court rejected that claim.

“We expect jurors to view significant criminal events in their hometown with an unapproving eye, whether it is the January 6th attack on the Capitol, a murder, or an armed robbery spree,” the court

Read more on independent.co.uk