Alabama lawmakers put forward bills to protect IVF medical providers after Supreme Court ruling

Alabama lawmakers introduced two bills on Tuesday that would shield medical providers that offer in vitro fertilisation services from civil and criminal liability.

The state Senate and House put forward the proposed bills nearly two weeks after the Alabama Supreme Court ruled that frozen embryos are legally protected children, forcing hospitals and clinics to halt treatments.

Senate Bill 159, introduced by Republican state senator Tim Melson, would provide “civil and criminal immunity provided for in vitro fertilization goods and services in certain circumstances”, according to the document’s text.

Later on Tuesday, Republican representative introduced House Bill 237 that would provide the same legal protections for IVF goods and services “except acts of omission that are intentional and not arising from or related to IVF services”.

Neither bill addressed the Supreme Court’s ruling that defined frozen embryos as children.

SB 159 would apply retroactively and automatically be repealed in April 2025. The house bill would repeal in June 2025.

The shock 16 February ruling from Alabama Supreme Court left it unclear how IVF providers could legally store, transport and use embryos.

A recent Alabama Supreme Court ruling that frozen embryos are legally protected children has plunged IVF treatment in the state into chaos

The ruling came from a 2020 case where a patient destroyed embryos at an IVF clinic, and echoed the views of some Christian fundamentalists and anti-abortion activists who believe that life begins at conception.

Democrats last week introduced House Bill 225 that would make “any fertilised human egg or human embryo that exists outside of a human uterus is not considered an unborn child or human being”.

Families