PolitMaster.com is a comprehensive online platform providing insightful coverage of the political arena: International Relations, Domestic Policies, Economic Developments, Electoral Processes, and Legislative Updates. With expert analysis, live updates, and in-depth features, we bring you closer to the heart of politics. Exclusive interviews, up-to-date photos, and video content, alongside breaking news, keep you informed around the clock. Stay engaged with the world of politics 24/7.

Contacts

  • Owner: SNOWLAND s.r.o.
  • Registration certificate 06691200
  • 16200, Na okraji 381/41, Veleslavín, 162 00 Praha 6
  • Czech Republic

Abortion Rights Groups Celebrate Win but See Risks Ahead

Medical groups and supporters of abortion rights hailed the Supreme Court’s rejection of the challenge to medication abortion, but with a heavy dose of caution.

“We are far from out of the woods,” said Cecile Richards, a former president of Planned Parenthood and now a leader of American Bridge, a group aligned with Democrats.

While the court on Thursday threw out the challenge from the Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine, attorneys general in three Republican-led states — Idaho, Missouri, and Kansas — are leading similar challenges that are likely to end up before the court.

And while the decision means that medication abortion will continue to be available at some pharmacies and by mail in states where abortion is legal, it does not change the fact that the pills remain illegal in the 14 states that ban abortion.

“Unfortunately, the attacks on abortion pills will not stop here — the anti-abortion movement sees how critical abortion pills are in this post-Roe world, and they are hellbent on cutting off access,” Nancy Northup, the president of the Center for Reproductive Rights, said in a statement. “In the end, this ruling is not a ‘win’ for abortion — it just maintains the status quo, which is a dire public health crisis.”

Abortion rights supporters argued that the challenge should never have ended up before the high court, because it was based on what many described as “junk science.” Two of the studies that anti-abortion groups had submitted to the court arguing that pills caused medical harm were retracted by medical journals.

Read more on nytimes.com